Medvedev President Rumours Today: Putin Still President & Nuclear Rhetoric

“Putin President 2025”: A Confirmed Reality

Dispelling any “Medvedev President Rumour,” Vladimir Putin secured a landslide victory in the Russian presidential elections held from March 15-17, 2024. Official results from the Russian Central Election Commission (CEC) confirmed that Putin won with an overwhelming 87.28% of the votes, marking his fifth term as president. He was officially inaugurated on May 7, 2024.

This victory, achieved with a record voter turnout of 77.49% in modern Russian history, solidified his grip on power and extended his presidency potentially until 2036, following constitutional reforms that reset term limits. Despite international observers often characterizing the election as lacking genuine competition, the outcome firmly establishes Putin as the undisputed leader of Russia in 2025 and for the foreseeable future. His daily activities, as reported by the Kremlin, continue to reflect his active role as the head of state, engaging in talks with foreign leaders and domestic officials.

Therefore, any suggestion that Dmitry Medvedev has replaced Putin as president is inaccurate. Medvedev’s role, while significant, is within the executive structure under President Putin.

“Dmitry Medvedev”: From President to Security Council Deputy

Dmitry Medvedev, who served as President of Russia from 2008 to 2012 and then as Prime Minister from 2012 to 2020, currently holds the influential position of Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of Russia. This body, chaired by President Putin himself, plays a crucial role in shaping Russia’s national security policies.

Since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Medvedev has adopted an increasingly hawkish and often apocalyptic tone in his public statements, particularly on social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Telegram. Once perceived as a more liberal or moderate figure within the Kremlin, his recent rhetoric has become sharply anti-Western, frequently attacking Western leaders and defending Russia’s actions in Ukraine. This shift is seen by many analysts as an attempt to redefine his public image and align more closely with the hardline elements within the Russian establishment.

His outspoken nature and willingness to engage in aggressive verbal exchanges with international figures have made him a key, albeit controversial, voice in Russia’s foreign policy discourse.

“Trump Ultimatum Warning”: A Dangerous Exchange

The latest “Ultimatum Clash” erupted following former U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent statements regarding the Ukraine conflict. Trump, who has often boasted about his relationship with Vladimir Putin, expressed growing frustration with the lack of progress towards peace. He initially set a 50-day deadline for Russia to agree to a peace deal, threatening “crippling economic consequences” if it was not met.

On July 28, 2025, Trump dramatically shortened this deadline, stating he was now giving Putin “10 to 12 days” to make progress, meaning he expects peace efforts to advance by August 7-9. This intensified “Trump Ultimatum Warning” was met with a swift and fiery response from Dmitry Medvedev.

Medvedev took to social media, warning Trump against “playing the ultimatum game with Russia.” He wrote: “Russia isn’t Israel or even Iran. Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country. Don’t go down the Sleepy Joe road!” This provocative statement underscored the Kremlin’s consistent warning that Western involvement could broaden the conflict beyond Ukraine’s borders.

The “US-Russia Tensions” are clearly at a heightened state, with both sides engaging in strong rhetoric. Medvedev’s comparison of Russia to countries like Israel or Iran, which have faced significant U.S. pressure, was a deliberate attempt to assert Russia’s perceived strength and warn against direct confrontation.

“Watch Your Words”: Trump Fires Back at Medvedev

Donald Trump did not hold back in his response to Medvedev’s provocative remarks. In a strongly worded post, Trump fired back, publicly dismissing Medvedev as a “failed former President of Russia, who thinks he’s still President,” and sternly telling him to “Watch Your Words.” Trump added, “He’s entering very dangerous territory!”

This exchange highlights the personal and often unpredictable nature of the diplomatic discourse between these two figures. Trump’s retort also included broader comments about international trade, stating, “I don’t care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. We have done very little business with India; their tariffs are too high, among the highest in the world.” This comment came concurrently with Trump’s announcement of a 25% tariff on Indian imports, effective August 1, criticizing New Delhi’s continued trade ties with Moscow.

Medvedev, for his part, has a history of using sarcastic and aggressive language towards Western leaders. Earlier in July, he sarcastically commented on Trump’s shifting positions on the Ukraine war, highlighting the perceived inconsistencies in U.S. policy. This pattern of escalating verbal attacks underscores the deep mistrust and animosity that defines current “US-Russia Tensions.”

Beyond Rhetoric: The Stakes of the “Kremlin Sanctions Immunity”

The ongoing “Trump Ultimatum Warning” and Medvedev’s defiant responses are not merely verbal sparring. They reflect the deepening geopolitical fault lines and the high stakes involved in the Ukraine conflict. Russia continues to demonstrate a strong resolve, seemingly unfazed by Western pressure, including the extensive sanctions regime. The “Kremlin Sanctions Immunity,” or at least its perceived resilience, allows figures like Medvedev to maintain a confrontational stance.

The warnings about direct war, while rhetorical, serve to underscore the potential for escalation. Both sides are attempting to project strength and deter the other, creating a tense and unpredictable international environment. The involvement of other nations, such as India, in this diplomatic crossfire further complicates the global landscape.

As the August 7-9 deadline approaches for Trump’s ultimatum, the world watches closely to see if the rhetoric will translate into concrete actions or further diplomatic maneuvers. The “Watch Your Words” admonition from Trump to Medvedev signifies the U.S.’s attempt to control the narrative and exert pressure, but the Kremlin’s response indicates a firm resistance to external dictates.